[petsc-dev] Regression tests

[Jed Brown]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> So what you're saying is that your system could be extended to do this?
>> I'm not disagreeing, but I think my suggestion is more maintainable and
>> extensible. As I said in my first reply, the differences are mostly
>> cosmetic, but I think there is good reason to prefer the form I suggest.
>> The important thing in either case is to have a database of tests so we can
>> program behavior.
>>
>
> Obviously I disagree. I responded to the maintainability argument, but you
> just ignored the response.
>

Since it's maintainable to put everything in one file, why not put all of
PETSc in one file?

I prefer local declaration of tests and the error conditions are handled
much better.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120726/f54f89d2/attachment.html>