[petsc-dev] clique

[Jed Brown]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jack Poulson <jack.poulson at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> In these cases, it sounds like the current best option is then to avoid
>>> using the CMake build system and manually link Elemental and Clique. If you
>>> have any suggestions, I am happy to work towards them as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> Satish's suggestion (which I agree with) is for me to add support in
>>> Clique's CMake build system for a user-specified Elemental library.
>>>
>>
>> I think this the Right Way.
>>
>
> I believe its The Right Way@ (copyright Barry Smith 1995).
>

Nope, it's a sleeper patent. The plan is to wait until enough corporations
with money use this patented innovation, then sue them for billions.
American Innovation at work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120831/173a32c0/attachment.html>