[petsc-dev] [petsc-maint #129715] __float128 complex
    Barry Smith 
    bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
       
    Thu Aug 23 11:25:38 CDT 2012
    
    
  
  Who cares, why not just live with the _ mangling?
   Barry
On Aug 23, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es> wrote:
> Yes. But the "stdcall" case seems more tedious. Anyway, __float128 is only available in GCC which uses underscore mangling, right?
> 
> True
    
    
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list