[petsc-dev] Recommended Petsc Build Procedure

[Aron Ahmadia]

I use the CMake build because it's the fastest, though it requires you to
have CMake installed on your system.

A

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Dave Nystrom <Dave.Nystrom at tachyonlogic.com
> wrote:

> At the end of configure.log, there are two possible ways to build petsc-dev
> that are specified.  Which is the recommended way to build - using make or
> using python?  I have been using make.
>
> Also, one is labeled as legacy and one is labeled as experimental.  That
> gives the impression of having a choice between an old, archaic method or a
> new, experimental approach.  Should one just be labeled as production?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120422/9fcdc494/attachment.html>