[petsc-dev] parmetis broken (with 64 bit indices)?

[Jed Brown]

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 00:34, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>  Hmm, why? I believe the decision was that those dependent packages where
> told to fix themselves to use the latest ParMetis and until then they are
> not usuable from PETSc. Are we going to fix SuperLU_Dist, UMFPACK, MUMPS,
> etc etc. all ourselves to work with the latest Parmetis. That is a
> downstream?/upstream? problem not ours.


I agree, but perhaps we should (oh my!) support both versions for a bit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110908/e3ffa3d9/attachment.html>