[petsc-dev] Questions about MatMatTransposeMult/MatMatMultTranspose

Dmitry Karpeev karpeev at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Nov 7 16:15:53 CST 2011


I would also argue that MatMultTransposeXXX should be MatTransposeMultXXX
(the matrix is first transposed,
and then MultXXX is done with the transposed matrix).  Likewise for
MatSolveTranspose.

Dmitry.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:44, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> I think I like the latter option better.
>
>
> I also think it's fine. We can hash if the number of string comparisons
> causes performance problems.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20111107/081577dc/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list