[petsc-dev] two quick questions on Fortran style/includes

[Ethan Coon]

On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 19:06 +0200, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:01, Ethan Coon <ecoon at lanl.gov> wrote:
>         Then why are there both .F90 and .F examples (e.g.
>         src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/{ex1f.F,ex44f.F90}) if both
>         must work in
>         both formats?
> 
> Use of Fortran 90 features (e.g. modules) instead of strict F77 does
> not require switching from fixed to free form. I agree that the long
> lines in ex44f.F90 require free form. It is also nothing like a
> "tutorial".

Ah, I think I missed that .F examples don't use modules and could
technically be F77 files (though must still be preprocessed).

Have I mentioned that I hate fortran?

Ethan

-- 
------------------------------------
Ethan Coon
Post-Doctoral Researcher
Applied Mathematics - T-5
Los Alamos National Laboratory
505-665-8289

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~ecoon/
------------------------------------