[petsc-dev] two quick questions on Fortran style/includes

[Jed Brown]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:01, Ethan Coon <ecoon at lanl.gov> wrote:

> Then why are there both .F90 and .F examples (e.g.
> src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/{ex1f.F,ex44f.F90}) if both must work in
> both formats?
>

Use of Fortran 90 features (e.g. modules) instead of strict F77 does not
require switching from fixed to free form. I agree that the long lines in
ex44f.F90 require free form. It is also nothing like a "tutorial".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110510/39671cb6/attachment.html>