[petsc-dev] TSBEULER and TSCN

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Sat Jul 2 16:56:33 CDT 2011

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> In refactoring TS, I want these implementations to go away (they are
> special cases of TSTHETA and it's easy for TSTHETA to be as efficient for
> the special case). The question is whether the names should be preserved,
> with implementations that look like
> TSCreate_BEuler(TS ts) {
> TSSetType(ts,TSTHETA);
> TSThetaSetTheta(ts,1.0);
> }
> or just have users set this themselves. Thoughts?

It will be somewhat confusing in that Backwards Euler will not appear in the
-ts_view. Maybe we could get a better
name for the helper function.


What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110702/4aa662d2/attachment.html>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list