[petsc-dev] Why both DMMGGetFine and DMMGGetDMMG?

[Matthew Knepley]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
>  They are identical.
>>
>
>   Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about the
> other one. I have removed it.
>
>
>
>> Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix?
>>
>
>   Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that didn't not
> need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this change in
> changes/dev.html!
>
>   Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the value
> in having two different ones since they generally seem to serve the same
> purpose. Who will fix this?
>

Where is all this stuff (and what) ?

  Matt


>   Barry
>
>
>> Jed
>>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100107/3c4687d1/attachment.html>