[petsc-dev] Why both DMMGGetFine and DMMGGetDMMG?
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Jan 7 08:22:24 CST 2010
On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> They are identical.
Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about
the other one. I have removed it.
>
> Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix?
Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that
didn't not need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this
change in changes/dev.html!
Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the
value in having two different ones since they generally seem to serve
the same purpose. Who will fix this?
Barry
>
> Jed
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list