[petsc-dev] Why both DMMGGetFine and DMMGGetDMMG?
    Barry Smith 
    bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
       
    Thu Jan  7 08:22:24 CST 2010
    
    
  
On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> They are identical.
    Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about  
the other one. I have removed it.
>
> Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix?
    Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that  
didn't not need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this  
change in changes/dev.html!
    Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the  
value in having two different ones since they generally seem to serve  
the same purpose. Who will fix this?
    Barry
>
> Jed
    
    
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list