[petsc-dev] DMDA_*PERIODIC and DMDA_XYZGHOSTED
Dmitry Karpeev
karpeev at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Dec 7 14:03:06 CST 2010
Frequently, error control based on local norms is, in fact, preferred, isn't
it?
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jed Brown <jed at 59a2.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 20:45, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Why can you not use VecAXPY() on the local Vecs?
>
>
> You're absolutely right. I must have been thinking of error control when I
> decided this was a problem. You need some sort of norms and don't want to
> double-count the ghost entries.
>
> Jed
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101207/c06d2cbb/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list