[petsc-dev] DMDA_*PERIODIC and DMDA_XYZGHOSTED
    Dmitry Karpeev 
    karpeev at mcs.anl.gov
       
    Tue Dec  7 14:03:06 CST 2010
    
    
  
Frequently, error control based on local norms is, in fact, preferred, isn't
it?
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jed Brown <jed at 59a2.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 20:45, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Why can you not use VecAXPY() on the local Vecs?
>
>
> You're absolutely right.  I must have been thinking of error control when I
> decided this was a problem.  You need some sort of norms and don't want to
> double-count the ghost entries.
>
> Jed
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101207/c06d2cbb/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list