Richard Tran Mills
rmills at ornl.gov
Mon Oct 29 15:03:51 CDT 2007
That accomplishes essentially the same thing as Lisandro's proposed
SNESSetLinearSolve() but is more consistent with the existing framework of
PETSc. In fact, it seems *inconsistent* right now that there is a way to use
a shell PC but not a way to use a shell KSP. Since it is not always "natural"
to think of every custom solver as a "preconditioner" (Lisandro provides an
example), it seems like there ought to be a KSP shell option. But what might
this mess up?
Just my 0.5 cents.
Barry Smith wrote:
> You seem to be saying you want something much like a KSP shell?
More information about the petsc-dev