petsc-dev directory structure questions
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Dec 14 12:05:34 CST 2007
On further thought, I'm ok with merging conf and config - provided
'config' [which would be the new merged name for conf] would not have
any of the old $PETSC_DIR/python stuff. [i,e if it goes somewere into
$PETSC_DIR/src/foobar]
We currently have generated files anyway at
PETSC_ARCH/conf/[configure.py,petscconf,petscrules], so I guess
PETSC_DIR/config/[configure.py,linux-gnu.py,base,rules,..] should be
equivalent.
With this, the curent user interface of ./config/configure.py
./config/linux-gnu.py would be unchanged.
Satish
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Satish Balay wrote:
> I guess my thoughts in the previous e-mail were all over the place -
> so here is an attempt to get something consistant out.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> <Barry>
>
> 2) putting the ons of sample configure.py files for different systems
> into a subdirectory called samples
>
> <Richard>
> A much more descriptive name for the 'config' directory would be
> something like 'BuildScripts'.
>
> <Lisandro>
> * I'm on Richard's side. I believe all the build scripts in 'config'
> should be placed in other location, let say 'maint/BuildScripts/'.
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> One issue here is - when you refer to scripts in config - are you
> refering to things like just 'linux-gnu.py' or both configure.py &
> linux-gnu.py.
>
> ** In the current design _both_ scripts are equivalent [wrt user
> invocation]. Hence in the same location. **
>
> <option1>
> So the current porposal of PETSC_DIR/BuildScripts & PETSC_DIR/config
> is _exaclty_ the same organization as what we had before [with
> PETSC_DIR/config & PETSC_DIR/python], with dirs being renamed.
> PETSC_DIR/python could have aswell be moved to PETSC_DIR/src/foobar
> [and it would still be consistant to me].
>
> Issue: Woud user now invoke ./BuildScripts/configure.py?
>
> <option2>
> However if the intent is to splitup configure.py & linux-gnu.py, the
> organization avaliable is: PETSC_DIR/configure.py, PETSC_DIR/config,
> and PETSC_DIR/BuildScripts.
>
> *****
> With the above two options , Barrys primary concern with eliminating
> one of 'conf' and 'config' is not resolved. [only better renaming is
> done, with a cost of different ueser interface with ./configure.py and
> ./BuildScripts/linux-gnu.py]
> ******
>
> <option2A>
> Now move PETSC_DIR/config to PETSC_DIR/src/config-foobar. This removes
> one dir from PETSC_DIR [however BuildScripts & conf, configure.py
> still remain]
>
> <options2B>
> Also move PETSC_DIR/BuildScripts to PETSC_DIR/maint/BuildScripts.
> However with this approach [as we don't distribute 'maint' to users,
> this would be loss in usr functionality.
>
> We are attempting all of this reorganization just because the name
> 'conf' is too close to 'config'. [And I fear we might break more than
> what we are fixing]
>
> Satish
>
>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list