PNetCDF problem
Wei-keng Liao
wkliao at eecs.northwestern.edu
Wed Nov 11 19:39:22 CST 2015
Hi, Han
Thanks for reporting the problem you are encountering.
Since PnetCDF 1.3.0 is quite old now (more than 3 years), I wonder
if you can try 1.6.1, the latest stable release. ncx.c has had a
significant revision since 1.3.0.
We do not have access to Fujitsu compilers. I would not be surprised
by problems on your environment. Actually, I was recently informed the same
BUS_ADRALN error was observed when using Fujitsu compilers. I am in the
process of getting an account on a machine with Fujitsu compilers, so I can
debug this issue. Before I can do anything, could you at least try
1.6.1? Thanks.
Wei-keng
On Nov 11, 2015, at 6:42 PM, hlung at us.fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is Han Lung, Director of HPC Group, Fujitsu America, Inc.
>
> I am working on WRF 3.7+PNetcdf 1.3.0 and got some errors. The test case is conus12km.
>
> I was told by wrfhelp that this error is related to internal of PNetCDF, so I am writing to you and hope I can get some help from you.
>
> I traced the error to ncmpix_put_size_t(void **xpp, const MPI_Offset lp, int sizeof_t) in ncx.c of parallel-netcdf-1.3.0. Here is the part of the code that caused the error:
>
>
> #ifdef WORDS_BIGENDIAN
> MPI_Offset *ptr = (MPI_Offset*) (*xpp); /* typecast to 8-byte integer */
> *ptr = lp; ç error here
> #else
> ……
>
> This is an operation for 8-byte integer lp (sizeof_t = 8). However, *xpp is incremented each time by 4 or 8, depending on sizeof_t: *xpp = (void *)((char *)(*xpp) + sizeof_t);
>
> Now when *xpp is not on 8-byte boundary (due to previous operation of 4-byte increment) the operation "*ptr = lp;" will cause the address not aligned error (BUS_ADRALN).
>
> In my case, for most of the time, sizeof_t is 4, and there is no problem. The first two times when sizeof_t is 8, *xpp is 591725472 and 591725720, respectively, which are at 8-byte boundary, so there is no problem, either. The third time when sizeof_t is 8, *xpp is 591725972, which is not at 8-byte boundary, and that caused the problem.
>
> I modified ncx.c to pad a 4-byte space if it’s not on 8-byte boundary. It did solve this mis-alignment problem but died at the free() call later. I am also not sure if this padding is a right approach since the padded parts are all garbage.
>
> Do you see this kind of error before? Any advice on how to resolve it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Han
More information about the parallel-netcdf
mailing list