[Nek5000-users] Problem with Genmap
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Wed Jun 26 14:28:44 CDT 2013
Hi,
It turns out the problem was with the genbox tool. I have updated the
makefile in trunk/tools to compile genbox in double precision. This should
take care of the problem and genmap should work as expected.
Be sure to do a clean recompile of genbox to enact the update.
Best,
Katie
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:54 AM, <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi Holly,
>
> I've posted this back to the list since it doesn't involve big
> data files and the resolution of the problem might be of interest
> to others.
>
> I think I see what's going on and have a couple ideas to fix it.
>
> Most likely, the reduction attained with 50 elements and a geomtric
> progression of 0.7 is wreaking havoc either in the .rea file or in
> the tolerances within genmap. A significant issue here is that
> the file format in the .rea file is in limited precision --- I think
> we can change that with little difficulty and still be compatible
> with the workflow. We'll look into that on our end.
>
> A reasonable work-around, which is what I typically do, would be
> to rescale your element coordinates inside nek, and just use a uniform
> mesh as the input. I'll send along some code on how to
> do this shortly --- along with another approach that will also
> give you focused resolution at the origin without the high aspect
> ratio elements that will result from the tensor-product approach
> used here.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Holly Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>>
>> My mesh is actually quite simple, I've had to reduce it from a much more
>> complicated version because Visit couldn't handle the number of elements I
>> was using.
>>
>> This is my .box file :
>>
>> linear.rea
>> 2
>> 1
>> #
>> # linear.box
>> #
>> Box
>> -50 -50
>> -3. 0. 0.7
>> -3. 0. 0.7
>> SYM, ,v ,
>> Box
>> -50 -50
>> -3. 0. 0.7
>> 0. 3. 1.3
>> SYM, , ,O
>> Box
>> -50 -50
>> 0. 3. 1.3
>> -3. 0. 0.7
>> ,SYM,v ,
>> Box
>> -50 -50
>> 0. 3. 1.3
>> 0. 3. 1.3
>> ,SYM, ,O
>>
>> I get the error for any mesh tolerance value when the scaling
>> coefficients are _<_ 0.7 or _>_ 1.3. However it works fine for _>_0.8 and
>> _<_1.2. I assume therefore it is that the elements of the mesh near the
>> center of the grid are just too small?
>>
>> Thanks again for your help,
>>
>> Holly
>>
>> Holly Johnson
>> Masters Student at ONERA - DAFE
>> Département d'Aérodynamique Fondamentale et Expérimentale
>> 8, Rue des Vertugadins
>> 92190 - Meudon - France
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20130626/cf810876/attachment.html>
More information about the Nek5000-users
mailing list