[mpich2-dev] Duplicate BVT names

[Brian Smith]

We'd probably prefer different names, yes. 

Thanks.


Brian Smith
BlueGene MPI Development
IBM Rochester
Phone: 507 253 4717
smithbr at us.ibm.com




"Rajeev Thakur" <thakur at mcs.anl.gov> 
Sent by: mpich2-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov
07/21/2009 11:29 AM
Please respond to
mpich2-dev at mcs.anl.gov


To
<mpich2-dev at mcs.anl.gov>
cc

Subject
Re: [mpich2-dev] Duplicate BVT names






Joe,
       We can easily use distinct names for those tests if it makes things 
easier.
 
Rajeev

From: mpich2-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov 
[mailto:mpich2-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Joe Ratterman
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:09 AM
To: MPICH2 Dev
Subject: [mpich2-dev] Duplicate BVT names

I was working on speeding up some BVT stuff on my system, and I noticed 
that there are a few tests that have duplicate names.  (checksizes might 
not be an issue, since I don't see it in the testlist)

./f77/init/checksizes
./f90/init/checksizes

./f90/misc/sizeof
./f90/datatype/sizeof

./spawn/taskmaster
./threads/spawn/taskmaster

This is problematic on BG since we use the "staging directory" features. 
This copies the binary--if it doesn't already exist--to an alternate 
directory before running the test.  Directory paths are not maintained. 
This means that only one of each of the groups will be run, probably 
twice.  I'm not sure if the staging directory system is really "supported" 
anymore, but I was wondering if it would be appropriate to change some of 
the names?

Thanks,
Joe Ratterman
jratt at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich2-dev/attachments/20090721/00788b00/attachment.htm>