[mpich-discuss] A Windows 7 implementation question
Jayesh Krishna
jayesh at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Feb 23 11:18:25 CST 2010
Hi,
I typically logon as an admin user on Windows Server 2008 and run jobs as a test user (mpiexec -user 2 -n 2 hostname). However I had to tinker with the policies to do that (The ones below).
Regards,
Jayesh
----- Original Message -----
Yes, if one logs in as the same user in the foreground, or logs on remotely then you can run in the background, but, and here's the rub, if you log in remotely say, if there was/is a foreground user that is different, they get knocked off. So essentially everyone has to run with the same ID to not be impacted. On a normal grid none of this is a problem, but when you're trying to have a "poor mans" grid and get simultaneous use out of the boxes as normal workstations, it becomes an issue.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jayesh Krishna" <jayesh at mcs.anl.gov>
To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:14:42 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] A Windows 7 implementation question
Hi,
Also, take a close look at the following Local Security policies,
1) Allow log on locally
2) Log on as a batch job
Regards,
Jayesh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jayesh Krishna" <jayesh at mcs.anl.gov>
To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:40:31 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] A Windows 7 implementation question
Hi,
Are you able to run MPI programs as the "background user", locally on the machine, after logging in as the "background user" (Login as the background user, Register the background user using "mpiexec -register" , Try running programs as the background user "mpiexec -n 2 hostname" )?
Regards,
Jayesh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave M Hiatt" <dave.m.hiatt at citi.com>
To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:58:45 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] A Windows 7 implementation question
No expert, we're walking the minefield for everyone else, but you're suggestion is one that sounds worth following up on. Thanks, as long as I have ideas, then there's hope for a practical solution.
From: mpich-discuss-bounces at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:mpich-discuss-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Biddiscombe, John A.
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:02 AM
To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] A Windows 7 implementation question
I have no expertise in the matter, but I’d bet that there is a ‘group policy’ setting/object somewhere that will allow you to enable background tasks/processes from other users via remote connections. Do you have some expert administrator for windows stuff that might know? (I tried googling, but there were too many unrelated hits).
JB
4 - Am I overlooking some other obvious solution that would be easier and solve all these problems beyond having to buy a whole new set of dedicated systems to run as a full time test cluster (right now I'll never get funding for that but I realize that is the solution that SHOULD be done, but I don't have anyone to bankroll it).
_______________________________________________
mpich-discuss mailing list
mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
_______________________________________________
mpich-discuss mailing list
mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
_______________________________________________
mpich-discuss mailing list
mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
More information about the mpich-discuss
mailing list