[MPICH] MPICH105 shm drops packages on SUN niagara

[Scott Atchley]

Tan,

It is supposed to be licensed the same. We generally use a BSD-style  
license for our code (ch_mx).

Scott

On Jul 19, 2007, at 1:19 AM, chong tan wrote:

> If its licensing scheme and list of licensor are differnt from  
> MPICH2, then it is too late for me
> to get legal approval to incoporate that package in my product.  I  
> currently have approval
> for MPICH2 only.
>
> tan
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Scott Atchley <atchley at myri.com>
> To: chong tan <chong_guan_tan at yahoo.com>
> Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov; Darius Buntinas <buntinas at mcs.anl.gov>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:52:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [MPICH] MPICH105 shm drops packages on SUN niagara
>
> Tan,
>
> We released a beta of MPICH2-MX last week and we have MX-10G for
> Solaris 10 on UltraSPARC and AMD64. I do not know if it would suffer
> the same dropped packets for shm, though.
>
> Scott
>
> On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:49 PM, chong tan wrote:
>
> >
> > Any suggestion for solution on Solaris other than socket ?   For
> > SMP and Niagra boxes, socket is a very bad solution.
> >
> > tan
>
>
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from  
> someone who knows.
> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.