[MPICH] MPICH105 shm drops packages on SUN niagara

[chong tan]

If its licensing scheme and list of licensor are differnt from MPICH2, then it is too late for me
to get legal approval to incoporate that package in my product.  I currently have approval
for MPICH2 only.  

tan



----- Original Message ----
From: Scott Atchley <atchley at myri.com>
To: chong tan <chong_guan_tan at yahoo.com>
Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov; Darius Buntinas <buntinas at mcs.anl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:52:32 PM
Subject: Re: [MPICH] MPICH105 shm drops packages on SUN niagara


Tan,

We released a beta of MPICH2-MX last week and we have MX-10G for  
Solaris 10 on UltraSPARC and AMD64. I do not know if it would suffer  
the same dropped packets for shm, though.

Scott

On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:49 PM, chong tan wrote:

>
> Any suggestion for solution on Solaris other than socket ?   For  
> SMP and Niagra boxes, socket is a very bad solution.
>
> tan


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/attachments/20070718/3253cdce/attachment.htm>