[MPICH] error 66, MPI 1.04p1
Rajeev Thakur
thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Aug 28 22:07:51 CDT 2006
In C++, the request is the value returned by the method. See
http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-20-html/node291.htm
Rajeev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chong tan [mailto:chong_guan_tan at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:57 PM
> To: Rajeev Thakur; mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: [MPICH] error 66, MPI 1.04p1
>
> thanks for pointing that out. However, in C++, it is
> possible to call Isend without the MPI_Request
> parameter, in which case there is nothing to wait for.
> If Isend should always be 'wait' ed for, then the
> mpicxx header file should always require the Request
> parameter.
>
> The application I am working on performs inter-process
> data exchange millions of time. at any given time,
> each process knows what to send/recieve from who. I
> am them doing Isend, then Recv. Once a process
> recieve the data it need, it is free to move on. It
> would be nice if Isend need not be waited for if there
> is not Request parameter.
>
> tan
>
> --- Rajeev Thakur <thakur at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > An Isend is required to be completed by a Wait. The
> > Wait frees the request
> > object returned by the Isend.
> >
> > Rajeev
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: chong tan [mailto:chong_guan_tan at yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 5:40 PM
> > > To: Rajeev Thakur; mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > > Subject: RE: [MPICH] error 66, MPI 1.04p1
> > >
> > >
> > > Inst Recv supposed to force a sync ?
> > > tan
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Rajeev Thakur <thakur at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > > You are doing too many Isends without calling
> > > > MPI_Wait to free the requests.
> > > > You need to add MPI_Wait.
> > > >
> > > > Rajeev
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: owner-mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > [mailto:owner-mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov] On
> > Behalf
> > > > Of chong tan
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 3:10 PM
> > > > > To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > Subject: [MPICH] error 66, MPI 1.04p1
> > > > >
> > > > > run this liktle test and get error 66.
> > > > >
> > > > > #define MPICH_IGNORE_CXX_SEEK
> > > > > #include "stdio.h"
> > > > > #include "mpi.h"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #define COUNT 200000
> > > > > #define DATA_SIZE 2048
> > > > >
> > > > > main( int *argc, char ***argv )
> > > > > {
> > > > > int rank, nproc ;
> > > > > int buf[ DATA_SIZE ] ;
> > > > > int **inbuf ;
> > > > > int i, j ;
> > > > > char *processor_name ;
> > > > >
> > > > > processor_name = new char [
> > > > MPI_MAX_PROCESSOR_NAME
> > > > > ] ;
> > > > > MPI_Init( argc, argv ) ;
> > > > > rank = MPI::COMM_WORLD.Get_rank( );
> > > > > nproc = MPI::COMM_WORLD.Get_size( );
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > inbuf = (int **)new int* [ nproc ] ;
> > > > > for( i = 0 ; i < nproc ; i++ ) {
> > > > > inbuf[ i ] = new int[ DATA_SIZE ] ;
> > > > > }
> > > > > if( rank == 0 ) {
> > > > > for( i = 0 ; i < COUNT ; i++ ) {
> > > > > for( j = 1 ; j < nproc ; j++ ) {
> > > > > MPI::COMM_WORLD.Isend( buf,
> > DATA_SIZE,
> > > > > MPI::INT, j, 999 ) ;
> > > > > MPI::COMM_WORLD.Recv( inbuf[ j ],
> > > > > DATA_SIZE, MPI::INT, j, 999 ) ;
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > > printf( "MASTER END..\n" ) ;
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > for( i = 0 ; i < COUNT ; i++ ) {
> > > > > for( j = 1 ; j < nproc ; j++ ) {
> > > > > MPI::COMM_WORLD.Isend( buf,
> > DATA_SIZE,
> > > > > MPI::INT, j, 999 ) ;
> > > > > MPI::COMM_WORLD.Recv( inbuf[ j ],
> > > > > DATA_SIZE, MPI::INT, j, 999 ) ;
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > > printf( "SLAGE %d END..\n", rank ) ;
> > > > > }
> > > > > MPI::Finalize() ;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > mpicxx main.cc
> > > > > mpiexec -n 2 a.out
> > > > > INTERNAL ERROR: Invalid error class (66)
> > > > encountered
> > > > > while returning from
> > > > > MPI_Recv. Please file a bug report. No error
> > > > stack
> > > > > is available.
> > > > > [cli_0]: aborting job:
> > > > > Fatal error in MPI_Recv: Error message texts
> > are
> > > > not
> > > > > available
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > > protection around
> > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
More information about the mpich-discuss
mailing list