[MOAB-dev] mixed mesh question

[Carlos Breviglieri]

Iulian, thanks for your attention

I have no problems upgrading to latest (nightly) version... I will run some
tests and let you know if everything is ok...

Regards,
Carlos



On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Iulian Grindeanu <iulian at mcs.anl.gov>wrote:

>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Both worked for me, with the current code (4.7.0pre)
>
> I don't get your error :(
> What version are you using? I will try 4.6.2, but it should be fine there
> too :(
>
>
> OK, I got an error with more quads, on 4.6.2 maybe I mixed them up when I
> saved :(
>  mpiexec -np 2 /home/iulian/source/MOAB46/tools/mbconvert -O
> PARALLEL=READ_PART -O PARTITION=PARALLEL_PARTITION -O
> PARALLEL_RESOLVE_SHARED_ENTS -O  PARALLEL_GHOSTS=2.0.1  -o
> PARALLEL=WRITE_PART  /home/iulian/tmp/2d_naca0012_mixed2.h5m 2.h5m
> Leaked HDF5 object handle in function at
> ../../../moab46source/src/io/ReadHDF5.cpp:1523
> Open at entrance: 1
> Open at exit:     2
> Leaked HDF5 object handle in function at
> ../../../moab46source/src/io/ReadHDF5.cpp:827
> Open at entrance: 1
> Open at exit:     2
> Failed to load "/home/iulian/tmp/2d_naca0012_mixed2.h5m".
> Error code: MB_INDEX_OUT_OF_RANGE (1)
> Error message: Failed in step PARALLEL READ PART
> Cannot close file with open handles: 0 file, 1 data, 0 group, 0 type, 0
> attr
>
>
> I will look into it.
>
> Hi Carlos,
> It looks like it is a bug in 4.6.2.
> I don't know if it will be fixed, there are some important changes in
> ghosting in current version.
> So for Version4.6 branch, the model with 17 quads works fine if you don't
> do ghosting:
>
> iulian at T520-iuli:~/source/MOAB46$ mpiexec -np 2
> /home/iulian/source/MOAB46/tools/mbconvert -O PARALLEL=READ_PART -O
> PARTITION=PARALLEL_PARTITION -O PARALLEL_RESOLVE_SHARED_ENTS  -o
> PARALLEL=WRITE_PART  /home/iulian/tmp/2d_naca0012_mixed_invert.h5m 2.h5m
> Read "/home/iulian/tmp/2d_naca0012_mixed_invert.h5m"
> Wrote "2.h5m"
>
> I would recommend upgrading to current version.
> That code is pretty complicated, and I am not sure if we will backport
> changes to Version4.6 branch.
>
> Tim, what do you suggest? Should I try to backport some changes in
> ParallelComm? I know you are working on that code.
>
> Thanks,
> Iulian
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/moab-dev/attachments/20131010/03421b25/attachment.html>