itaps-parallel Two options from today's iMeshP phone conference
Saurabh Tendulkar
saurabh at simmetrix.com
Mon Jul 19 11:46:12 CDT 2010
>>
>> I think for A, we proposed that the argument be NULL in case of serial.
>> If we want no restriction in iMesh, then maybe we can instead pass an
>> array of entity sets to iMesh_createEnt, and then in iMeshP stipulate
>> that one of them has to be a part.
>>
>
> Logically null. Not literally 'NULL' (a bit-wise zero value). Not all
> implementations use pointer-based handles, and therefore zero is not an
> invalid handle value for all implementations. The closest thing we have to
> a logical null is the root set (as everything goes into the root set anyway.)
>
> - jason
Don't they have to use pointer-based handles, since iBase_EntitySetHandle is
typedef'd as:
typedef struct iBase_EntitySetHandle_Private* iBase_EntitySetHandle;
in iBase.h?
saurabh
More information about the itaps-parallel
mailing list