itaps-parallel This week's conference call

[seol at scorec.rpi.edu]

Karen,

The compromise proposal will work fine with the FMDB.

One question is that the use case, efficiency, and the ease of handling of
the entity ownership if we allow the user to specify the owner part of
mesh entity.

It's not clear to me what's our scenario between #1 and #2.

#1 we assume that the owner part of the entity is automatically determined
at time of entity creation by default and will allow some exceptional case
where the user can specify the owner part for specific entities

#2 for every entity, the owner part shall be specified explicitly.

In case of the FMDB, the owner part is determined based on the partition
model classification to which each entity belongs so the application has
no right to change the entity ownership at the moment.

Seegyoung


> Since we rescheduled the iMeshP conference call (now Thursday, May 27 at
> 8am
> PDT), I'll ask you to do some extra work.  Please consider the attached
> use
> cases (drafted by Tim -- thanks, Tim!).  For each case, consider whether
> the
> proposal works, particularly in the context of your implementation.  We'll
> discuss the proposal and use cases on Thursday.
>
> Thanks.
> Karen
>
>