[cgma-dev] [Fathom] cgm make check with occ
Jiangtao Hu
jiangtao_ma at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 15 12:03:45 CDT 2011
Iulian:
How do I see where's the failure? I ran on my local machine, it passed.
Jane
--- On Thu, 9/15/11, Iulian Grindeanu <iulian at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
From: Iulian Grindeanu <iulian at mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ
To: "Jiangtao Hu" <jiangtao_ma at yahoo.com>
Cc: "CGMA Development" <cgma-dev at mcs.anl.gov>, "James Porter" <jvporter at wisc.edu>
Date: Thursday, September 15, 2011, 12:55 PM
Hi Jane,
According to
http://gnep.mcs.anl.gov:8010/waterfall?category=broken
cgm_occ is failing.
It is the same error I get, it seems
I am not sure why we don't get messages about this failed test.
Iulian
----- Original Message -----
> Hi, Iulian,
>
> Those missing files are only for 10.2 cgm, 12.2 cgm has already have
> them. Can you let me know where the modify failed? Thanks.
>
> Is the nightly build and check for cgm still on? Can James confirm it?
> Thanks.
>
> Jane
>
> --- On Thu, 9/15/11, Iulian Grindeanu <iulian at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Iulian Grindeanu <iulian at mcs.anl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ
> To: "Jiangtao Hu" <jiangtao_ma at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "CGMA Development" <cgma-dev at mcs.anl.gov>
> Date: Thursday, September 15, 2011, 12:20 PM
>
>
> Hi Jane,
> modify fails.
> You said that some files were missing, but you checked them only on
> cubit 10.2 branch.
>
> My configure command is
> ./configure --prefix=/homes/iulian/lib/CGM
> --with-mpi=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mp
> ich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin
> --with-occ=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/occ/OpenCASCADE6.5.0
> /gcc --enable-debug
> CC=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpicc
> CXX=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpicxx
> FC=/homes/fathom/3
> rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpif90
> F90=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mp
> ich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpif90
> F77=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin
> /mpif77
>
>
> Iulian
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi, Iulian,
> >
> > Trunk cgm with occ6.5 passed make check for me, is it the case for
> > you?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > jane
> >
> > --- On Wed, 9/14/11, Iulian Grindeanu < iulian at mcs.anl.gov > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Iulian Grindeanu < iulian at mcs.anl.gov >
> > Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ
> > To: "Jiangtao Hu" < jiangtao_ma at yahoo.com >
> > Cc: fathom at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> > Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 12:29 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hi Jane,
> > > Why should I check out version cubit 10.2 for testing occ?
> > > I thought that tag/branch is created for maintaining cubit 10.2
> > > based
> > > cgm, not occ 6.3 based cgm.
> > >
> > > If we are going to not support occ 6.3 on the main trunk, it
> > > should
> > > be
> > > clearly stated.
> > > I will check out the branch though, and let you know if I still
> > > have
> > > problems.
> > >
> > > Iulian
> >
> > Hi Jane,
> > So I still have one test failing on occ 6.3 based cgm, when I
> > checked
> > out cgm with tag cubit10.2
> > (makept)
> > I am pretty sure I patched my occ 6.3, but I will double check.
> >
> > So, should we not use anymore occ 6.3 on the main trunk? Should I
> > build occ 6.5 on my laptop too?
> > Are we discontinuing support on occ 6.3?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Iulian
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > Did you check out code from
> > > > https://svn.mcs.anl.gov/repos/ITAPS/cgm/tags/cubit10.2 ? This is
> > > > code
> > > > for cubit10.2 that Hong-Jun created yesterday. What I did was
> > > > check
> > > > out this directory, and build with opencascase6.3, and make
> > > > check
> > > > now
> > > > passed.
> > > >
> > > > If you check out it now, you should get the version 5160, which
> > > > has
> > > > included two more testcases.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Jane
> > > >
> > > > --- On Wed, 9/14/11, Iulian Grindeanu < iulian at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Iulian Grindeanu < iulian at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ
> > > > To: "Jiangtao Hu" < jiangtao_ma at yahoo.com >
> > > > Cc: fathom at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> > > > Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 11:43 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On occ 6.3, I have a total of 5 tests failing, on the main
> > > > trunk:
> > > >
> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23677 Segmentation fault "$tst" >
> > > > testgeom_occ.log-t 2>&1
> > > > FAIL: testgeom_occ
> > > > ..
> > > >
> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23911 Segmentation fault "$tst" >
> > > > modify.log-t
> > > > 2>&1
> > > > FAIL: modify
> > > > PASS: subtract
> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23965 Segmentation fault "$tst" >
> > > > makept.log-t
> > > > 2>&1
> > > > FAIL: makept
> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23992 Segmentation fault "$tst" > r_w.log-t
> > > > 2>&1
> > > > FAIL: r_w
> > > > PASS: test_occ
> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 24046 Segmentation fault "$tst" >
> > > > operation.log-t
> > > > 2>&1
> > > > FAIL: operation
> > > > ...
> > > > Iulian
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > Sorry, it was Opencascade6.3 that I checked, now checking 6.5,
> > > > > it
> > > > > failed build. I am looking to into it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jane
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Tue, 9/13/11, Iulian Grindeanu < iulian at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Iulian Grindeanu < iulian at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > > Subject: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ
> > > > > To: fathom at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2011, 3:05 PM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have some errors in make check in occ-based cgm:
> > > > >
> > > > > If I use occ 6.3, there are 5 tests totally failing
> > > > >
> > > > > occ 6.5: 1 test failing (test_modify)
> > > > >
> > > > > ./modify
> > > > > Geometry engine set to: OpenCascade 6.5
> > > > > Created volume(s): 2
> > > > > Destroyed volume(s): 1
> > > > > Updated volume(s): 2
> > > > > terminate called after throwing an instance of
> > > > > 'Standard_NoSuchObject'
> > > > > Aborted
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have these problems?
> > > > >
> > > > > cubit 12.2 based cgm is fine for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Iulian
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Fathom mailing list
> > > > > Fathom at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/fathom
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fathom mailing list
> > > Fathom at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> > > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/fathom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/cgma-dev/attachments/20110915/c2533ffc/attachment.htm>
More information about the cgma-dev
mailing list