<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Iulian:<br><br>How do I see where's the failure? I ran on my local machine, it passed.<br><br>Jane<br><br><br>--- On <b>Thu, 9/15/11, Iulian Grindeanu <i><iulian@mcs.anl.gov></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Iulian Grindeanu <iulian@mcs.anl.gov><br>Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ<br>To: "Jiangtao Hu" <jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com><br>Cc: "CGMA Development" <cgma-dev@mcs.anl.gov>, "James Porter" <jvporter@wisc.edu><br>Date: Thursday, September 15, 2011, 12:55 PM<br><br><div class="plainMail">Hi Jane,<br><br>According to <br><a href="http://gnep.mcs.anl.gov:8010/waterfall?category=broken" target="_blank">http://gnep.mcs.anl.gov:8010/waterfall?category=broken</a><br><br>cgm_occ is failing.<br>It is the same error I get, it
seems<br><br>I am not sure why we don't get messages about this failed test.<br><br>Iulian<br><br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>> Hi, Iulian,<br>> <br>> Those missing files are only for 10.2 cgm, 12.2 cgm has already have<br>> them. Can you let me know where the modify failed? Thanks.<br>> <br>> Is the nightly build and check for cgm still on? Can James confirm it?<br>> Thanks.<br>> <br>> Jane<br>> <br>> --- On Thu, 9/15/11, Iulian Grindeanu <<a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a>> wrote:<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> From: Iulian Grindeanu <<a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a>><br>> Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ<br>> To: "Jiangtao Hu" <<a ymailto="mailto:jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com"
href="/mc/compose?to=jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com">jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com</a>><br>> Cc: "CGMA Development" <<a ymailto="mailto:cgma-dev@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=cgma-dev@mcs.anl.gov">cgma-dev@mcs.anl.gov</a>><br>> Date: Thursday, September 15, 2011, 12:20 PM<br>> <br>> <br>> Hi Jane,<br>> modify fails.<br>> You said that some files were missing, but you checked them only on<br>> cubit 10.2 branch.<br>> <br>> My configure command is<br>> ./configure --prefix=/homes/iulian/lib/CGM<br>> --with-mpi=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mp<br>> ich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin<br>> --with-occ=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/occ/OpenCASCADE6.5.0<br>> /gcc --enable-debug<br>> CC=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpicc<br>> CXX=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpicxx<br>> FC=/homes/fathom/3<br>> rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpif90<br>> F90=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mp<br>>
ich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin/mpif90<br>> F77=/homes/fathom/3rdparty/mpich2/mpich2-1.2.1/gcc/bin<br>> /mpif77<br>> <br>> <br>> Iulian<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ----- Original Message -----<br>> > Hi, Iulian,<br>> ><br>> > Trunk cgm with occ6.5 passed make check for me, is it the case for<br>> > you?<br>> ><br>> > Thanks.<br>> ><br>> > jane<br>> ><br>> > --- On Wed, 9/14/11, Iulian Grindeanu < <a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a> > wrote:<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > From: Iulian Grindeanu < <a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a> ><br>> > Subject: Re: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ<br>> > To: "Jiangtao Hu" < <a ymailto="mailto:jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com"
href="/mc/compose?to=jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com">jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com</a> ><br>> > Cc: <a ymailto="mailto:fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov">fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov</a><br>> > Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 12:29 PM<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > ----- Original Message -----<br>> > > Hi Jane,<br>> > > Why should I check out version cubit 10.2 for testing occ?<br>> > > I thought that tag/branch is created for maintaining cubit 10.2<br>> > > based<br>> > > cgm, not occ 6.3 based cgm.<br>> > ><br>> > > If we are going to not support occ 6.3 on the main trunk, it<br>> > > should<br>> > > be<br>> > > clearly stated.<br>> > > I will check out the branch though, and let you know if I still<br>> > > have<br>> > > problems.<br>> > ><br>> > >
Iulian<br>> ><br>> > Hi Jane,<br>> > So I still have one test failing on occ 6.3 based cgm, when I<br>> > checked<br>> > out cgm with tag cubit10.2<br>> > (makept)<br>> > I am pretty sure I patched my occ 6.3, but I will double check.<br>> ><br>> > So, should we not use anymore occ 6.3 on the main trunk? Should I<br>> > build occ 6.5 on my laptop too?<br>> > Are we discontinuing support on occ 6.3?<br>> ><br>> > Thanks,<br>> > Iulian<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > ><br>> > > ----- Original Message -----<br>> > > > Did you check out code from<br>> > > > <a href="https://svn.mcs.anl.gov/repos/ITAPS/cgm/tags/cubit10.2" target="_blank">https://svn.mcs.anl.gov/repos/ITAPS/cgm/tags/cubit10.2</a> ? This is<br>> > > > code<br>> > > > for cubit10.2 that Hong-Jun created yesterday. What I did was<br>> > >
> check<br>> > > > out this directory, and build with opencascase6.3, and make<br>> > > > check<br>> > > > now<br>> > > > passed.<br>> > > ><br>> > > > If you check out it now, you should get the version 5160, which<br>> > > > has<br>> > > > included two more testcases.<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Thanks.<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Jane<br>> > > ><br>> > > > --- On Wed, 9/14/11, Iulian Grindeanu < <a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a> ><br>> > > > wrote:<br>> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > > From: Iulian Grindeanu < <a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a> ><br>> > > > Subject: Re:
[Fathom] cgm make check with occ<br>> > > > To: "Jiangtao Hu" < <a ymailto="mailto:jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com" href="/mc/compose?to=jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com">jiangtao_ma@yahoo.com</a> ><br>> > > > Cc: <a ymailto="mailto:fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov">fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov</a><br>> > > > Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 11:43 AM<br>> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > > On occ 6.3, I have a total of 5 tests failing, on the main<br>> > > > trunk:<br>> > > ><br>> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23677 Segmentation fault "$tst" ><br>> > > > testgeom_occ.log-t 2>&1<br>> > > > FAIL: testgeom_occ<br>> > > > ..<br>> > > ><br>> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23911 Segmentation fault "$tst" ><br>> > > > modify.log-t<br>> > > >
2>&1<br>> > > > FAIL: modify<br>> > > > PASS: subtract<br>> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23965 Segmentation fault "$tst" ><br>> > > > makept.log-t<br>> > > > 2>&1<br>> > > > FAIL: makept<br>> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 23992 Segmentation fault "$tst" > r_w.log-t<br>> > > > 2>&1<br>> > > > FAIL: r_w<br>> > > > PASS: test_occ<br>> > > > /bin/bash: line 1: 24046 Segmentation fault "$tst" ><br>> > > > operation.log-t<br>> > > > 2>&1<br>> > > > FAIL: operation<br>> > > > ...<br>> > > > Iulian<br>> > > ><br>> > > > ----- Original Message -----<br>> > > > > Sorry, it was Opencascade6.3 that I checked, now checking 6.5,<br>> > > > > it<br>> > > > > failed build. I am looking
to into it.<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > Jane<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > --- On Tue, 9/13/11, Iulian Grindeanu < <a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a> ><br>> > > > > wrote:<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > ><br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > From: Iulian Grindeanu < <a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a> ><br>> > > > > Subject: [Fathom] cgm make check with occ<br>> > > > > To: <a ymailto="mailto:fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov">fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov</a><br>> > > > > Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2011, 3:05 PM<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > Hello,<br>> > >
> ><br>> > > > > I have some errors in make check in occ-based cgm:<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > If I use occ 6.3, there are 5 tests totally failing<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > occ 6.5: 1 test failing (test_modify)<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > ./modify<br>> > > > > Geometry engine set to: OpenCascade 6.5<br>> > > > > Created volume(s): 2<br>> > > > > Destroyed volume(s): 1<br>> > > > > Updated volume(s): 2<br>> > > > > terminate called after throwing an instance of<br>> > > > > 'Standard_NoSuchObject'<br>> > > > > Aborted<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > Does anyone have these problems?<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > cubit 12.2 based cgm is fine for me.<br>> > >
> ><br>> > > > > Thanks,<br>> > > > > Iulian<br>> > > > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > > > Fathom mailing list<br>> > > > > <a ymailto="mailto:Fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=Fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov">Fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov</a><br>> > > > > <a href="https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/fathom" target="_blank">https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/fathom</a><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > Fathom mailing list<br>> > > <a ymailto="mailto:Fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=Fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov">Fathom@lists.mcs.anl.gov</a><br>> > > <a href="https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/fathom" target="_blank">https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/fathom</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table>