[AG-TECH] Re: Possible Bug with VenueManager

west suhanic west.suhanic at gmail.com
Thu Jun 7 14:07:07 CDT 2007


Hi Tom:

It is AG3, the latest release. Thanks for getting back to me and I look
forward
to AG3.1

regards,

west

On 6/7/07, Thomas D. Uram <turam at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi West:
>
> AG2 or AG3?
>
> AG3 does not have any facility for using a certificate with passphrase,
> so you should
> use a VenueServer service certificate to run a VenueServer.  The 3.1
> release will allow
> you to assign administrative rights to individuals who hold Identity
> Certificates, which
> do require a passphrase.
>
> So the behavior you're seeing is appropriate to the current AG3 release.
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 6/1/07 3:49 PM, west suhanic wrote:
> > Hello All:
> >
> > There may be a problem with the VenueManager code.
> >
> > I am running my own VenueServer. In order to run your own VenueServer
> > you need to generate your own x509 certificates. The problem arises
> > when I use a x509 certificate for the VenueServer that requires the user
> > starting the VenueServer to supply a password. If I use this type of
> > certificate
> > the VenueServer starts and operates fine. However when I go to
> > configure the
> > VenueServer using the VenueManager, I cannot connect the VenueManager to
> > the VenueServer. When I start the VenueManager it prompts me for the
> > password
> > for the x509 certificate however it will noyt connect me to the
> > VenueServer. If
> > I use a x509 certificate that does not prompt for a password the
> > VenueManager works
> > as expected.
> >
> > Hopefully someone else can test this scenario to verify my statements.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > West
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-tech/attachments/20070607/3fbc39b5/attachment.htm>


More information about the ag-tech mailing list