[AG-TECH] AG 2.4 and 3.0 servers

[Jeremy Mann]

Thanks the reply Tom. Fortunately, I figured that out a few minutes
after sending the message ;) One more thing though, is the bridge3.py
config file the same as 2.4? Also, if I host a bridge for 3.0.2 will
the client automatically choose the local bridge or will it choose one
of the preconfigured unicast bridges?


On 9/26/06, Thomas D. Uram <turam at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Jeremy:
>
> The main port for the server is specified on the command line.
> You need to add this option to the command line:
>
> --port=9000
>
> It's been suggested that this be added to the config file to avoid
> this problem.
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 9/26/06 9:08 AM, Jeremy Mann wrote:
> > I'm trying to configure an AG 3.x server to work on our AG 2.4
> > machine. Everything installed fine and I've searched this mailing list
> > for the requirements to run them on the same machine. I have 2.4 on
> > the  800x ports and 3.0 on 900x. However, when I start the
> > VenueServer3.py with my config file it says:
> >
> > ag at ag1:~$ VenueServer3.py -c VenueServer3.cfg
> > Network error running server; an application is already running on one
> > of the ports required
> >
> > My config file is:
> >
> > [VenueServer]
> > defaultVenue = 00000108b4c7937d0081006f004500a70fd
> > performanceReportFile =
> > dataStorageLocation = Data
> > venuePathPrefix = Venues
> > eventPort = 9002
> > serverPrefix = VenueServer
> > performanceReportFrequency = 0
> > encryptAllMedia = 1
> > addressMask = 17
> > addressAllocationMethod = random
> > dataPort = 9006
> > textPort = 9004
> > baseAddress = 224.2.230.0
> > houseKeeperFrequency = 300
> > persistenceFilename = VenueServer3.dat
> > backupServer =
> >
> > Thanks for any help!
> >
> >
>


-- 
Jeremy