[Fwd: Re: [AG-TECH] One-page summary of AG port usage -- please help us complete it]

[Thomas D. Uram]

I'm reposting this to encourage responses.  There was a lot of noise on this 
thread initially;
please be noisy now.

If you have concerns about firewalls and the AG,
talk to your network admins so we can address them.  Specifically (reposting 
from original):

> What are the concerns of your admins?
> Do they care at all about opening up the multicast address range?  Why?
> Would it be enough to be able to select a bridge with a known port range that would work for any venue?
> 
> I think the real problem is in bridging, where you're concerned with traffic from
> real hosts.  But let's get input from some of those (Draconian) net admins and build
> a practical solution. 





-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Thomas D. Uram" <turam at mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] One-page summary of AG port usage -- please help us
 complete it
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:02:27 -0600
Size: 10112
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-tech/attachments/20060227/b7c06bf9/attachment.eml>