[AG-TECH] New version of AGVCR available - was 'AGVCR file format'

Derek Piper dcpiper at indiana.edu
Tue Nov 15 12:27:55 CST 2005

	Hi all,

	To let you know, I've just now put a version of AGVCR out there that 
will record and play back any number of streams in the new format. It's 
still early days yet so although I'm going to try and record the 
SCGlobal that's on in 10 minutes it's not guaranteed it's not going to 
blow up at some point. :> I've only tested it with the basic 4 that I 
had before (i.e. Audio RTP/RTCP and Video RTP/RTCP), but I've had 
success in both Linux and Windows.
	Still, as ever, I invite people to try it out and send me feedback. The 
file format I'm happy with, it will be possible for it to support new 
packet streams in later releases while still being compatible with files 
recorded now.




Nagykaldi, Zsolt F. (HSC) wrote:
> Me 2. Go ahead. Do something amazing.
> _ _ _
> Zsolt Nagykaldi, PhD
> Research Associate, Clinical IT Specialist
> University Of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
> Department Of Family And Preventive Medicine
> Oklahoma Center For Family Medicine Research
> 900 NE 10th Street
> Oklahoma City, OK 73104
> Phone: (405) 271-8000 Ext.:1-32212
> Fax:     (405) 271-1682
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov on behalf of Wachtel, Robert L
> *Sent:* Fri 11/11/2005 2:16 PM
> *To:* Derek Piper; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> *Subject:* RE: [AG-TECH] AGVCR file format
> No problem Derek. I have just been testing so far.
> Bob Wachtel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov] On
> Behalf Of Derek Piper
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 6:55 AM
> To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [AG-TECH] AGVCR file format
>         Hi all,
>         I had a thought yesterday that possibly I should make some
> changes to
> allow AGVCR to support, at least in the file format for now, any number
> of RTP/RTCP streams per-recording. Now, I know it's only been out for a
> couple of days and only people on this list know about it, so I was
> thinking that if I make those changes - would it matter if it broke any
> recordings anyone has made at this point? I can try and get the
> converter program working correctly if anyone's recorded anything in the
> last couple of days they absolutely cannot live without. I have
> recordings of my own that are nearly able to be converted perfectly from
> even older formats I had, so the converter will be around eventually.
>         I know I said I wouldn't change the file format, but given the
> responses I've had, it seems that supporting anything from 1 stream or
> more would be a useful change to make at this point, i.e. before too
> many recordings get made. Adding on different types of streams to record
> and interface changes can come later but then will be compatible with
> recordings made in the new format.
>         I probably should look at setting up some sort of mailing list
> for this
> program so I'm not hijacking the ag-tech list to discuss it :) So,
> thanks ANL :)
>         Anyway, I thought I'd throw that out there in case anyone had
> any such
> recording they have to keep, anything to mention, or ideas they want to
> see incorporated. Feel free to contact me off-list if you'd prefer.
>         Thanks,
>         Derek
> --
> Derek Piper - dcpiper at indiana.edu - (812) 856 0111
> IRI 323, School of Informatics
> Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

Derek Piper - dcpiper at indiana.edu - (812) 856 0111
IRI 323, School of Informatics
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

More information about the ag-tech mailing list