[AG-TECH] AG session for network staff ?
monika.k.rabarison
monika.k.rabarison at ccaix.jsums.edu
Thu Jun 2 14:39:47 CDT 2005
Mike meant July 5th Townhall.
-Monika
> Tom,
> Monica Rabarison expressed an interest in having a meeting
> to discuss mutlicast issues and troubleshooting for the
> access grid. (see below some of the email we have been
> sending.) I have found two people who are willing to
> participate in this. Mike O'Conner from ESNet and Greg
> Bell from LBLNet. Mike is willing to give the
> presentation and Greg is willing to help answer
> questions. The first question is can this be done at the
> 8 am townhall on July 7 (Mike can only do the 8 am
> presentation) The second question is what kind of
> discussion do you think would be good to present.
> Thank you,
> Mike
>
> Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > Sure, July 5 for the 8AM pacific meeting is fine, I'll
> > have to decline the later meeting.
> >
> > We should talk about the audience and topic of
> discussion. >
> > -Mike
> >
> > Michael Elmore wrote:
> >
> >> Mike,
> >> I just heard from Greg and he said that July 5 is ok
> with him. He >> also said he would be willing to attend
> and help answer questions. >> Mike would you be willing
> and could you have a presentation available >> by July 5?
> Also, there are usually two meetings for the town hall.
> >> One at 8 am pacific and one at 4 pm pacific. Could
> you and would >> you be willing to do both meetings. If
> you can only do the morning >> one it would be fine.
> >> Thank you,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> monika.k.rabarison wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>> July 5th is fine for me.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Monika
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Monica et al.,
> >>>> I was wondering if it would be ok to do the meeting
> at the >>>> July 5 townhall. I will be on vacation for
> all of the >>>> dates you listed. Is this ok for MIke
> and Greg? >>>> Thank you,
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>> monika.k.rabarison wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any date/time except June 10, 13, and 17 is fine for
> me. >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Monika
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello Greg and MIke,
> >>>>>> I received this from Monika about the content of
> the >>>>>> meeting. The date is not set. If you can't
> meet at >>>>>> Brookhaven on the 7th, then we could
> schedule this for >>>>>> another time. Monika, do you
> have another date in mind? >>>>>> Thank you, Mike
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> monika.k.rabarison wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mike,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the session is mainly intended for network
> personel but >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> node >ops too could benefit from it. When the idea
> came >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> up >>, what >everyone wanted was mostly about how to
> know >>>> that >>there is a >multicast problem and how to
> fix the >>>> problem, >>and also >re-explain how the AG is
> using >>>> multicast. There >>is already >an AGDP doc
> about these but >>>> apparently >>everyone (mostly node
> >operators) wanted to >>>> have the >>network people
> attend such a >session. It looks >>>> like in >>many cases
> , the network person is >not very >>>> familiar with >>the
> AG and the node operator is not >very >>>> familiar with
> >>networking! How technical it should be? >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'm not very sure >>about this. >
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks again,
> >>>>>>> Monika
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Monica,
> >>>>>>>> I have talked to Greg and he is not sure what he
> can >>>>>>>> prepare for a meeting like this. How
> technical he >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> can >>>>make it etc. He would like to know more
> >>>> specifically >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> what >>you would like to get out of a multicast
> >>>>>> presentation. >>Thank you and have a good weekend.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> monika.k.rabarison wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Mike,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please do so. June 7 sounds good to me. If it is
> too >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> close >for the presenter(s) any time would do, I
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> guess. >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks again,
> >>>>>>>>> Monika
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Monica,
> >>>>>>>>>> Would you like me to ask the networking people
> if >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> they >>>>>>would like to give a presentation? If so
> then >>>> maybe >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> they >>could do the presentation at the next
> Town >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> Hall >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> on >>June >>7. One of the people might have a
> problem with 8 >>>>>> >>am, but >>I can find out. Let me
> know or let >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> me >>know >>about another >>time. Thank you,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> monika.k.rabarison wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mike,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you indeed for your response. You are
> right >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> nobody >>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> has >replied to this suggestion yet. I am
> cc-ing >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> Alex >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> as >>>>they are >also interested in such a session
> at >>>>>> TACC. >>>>Having the talk >on a Town Hall is a
> great >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> idea. >>I am >>>>thinking that the >summer might not
> be a >>>> good >>time as >>>>people go on vacation.
> >Anyway, we >>>> could have >>it >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> whenever >>the speakers are >available.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Monika
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Monika,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for not responding to this earlier. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> haven't >>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> seen >>any other responses either. I am not
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> willing >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> to >>>>lead >>such a meeting, but I am willing to
> try >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> and >>get >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> a >>speaker >>for you. One of the Network people
> at >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> LBNL >>is >>quite >>versed in Multicasting and I
> think >>>>>> that he >>might >>be >>willing to give a
> talk and I >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> could >>try to >>get the >>person >>at ESNet who
> isolates >>>> the >>multicast >>troubles on >>ESNet. >>Let
> me know what you >>>> >>think. Maybe >>it could be
> >>done on a >>Town Hall >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> meeting. Thank you, >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> monika.k.rabarison wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A suggestion poped up at the AG retreat on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> organizing >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> an >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> AG >session for network staff.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to have one person or more share
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> knowledge, >>>>>how-tos, tips, etc...on AG
> network >>>>>>>> support. How does >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> that >>>sound? Is there anyone out there
> willing to >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> lead >>>>such >>>session? Node operators too would
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> indeed >>benefit >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> from it >>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as >some of us (at least myself)are not very
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> network >>>>>>>>"literate". >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Monika
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
More information about the ag-tech
mailing list