Trusted certs - was: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?

[Jon Johansson]

Oops, I forgot to use 'Reply to All'.

I'm getting a password error on a WinXP machine with
the same user certs that I use on other machines.
I've checked that the certs that I imported are not
corrupted and my configuration seems ok.
How do I check the trusted certs and where do I get
them if they don't come with the installation?

Thanks,
Jon.

-- 
Jon I Johansson             *  Research Computing Support
jon.johansson at ualberta.ca   *  Computing and Network Services
Tel.: (780) 492-9304        *  University of Alberta
Fax.: (780) 492-1729        *  Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Supreeya Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:58 PM
> To: Randy Groves; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?
> 
> 
> Randy,
> 
> At CHL, we are running a room node with 4 machines.  The 
> Display machine is
> running Windows 2000.
> 
> The 2.1.2 installation was easy and smooth.  However, I had 
> an installation
> problem on a PIG XP that it did not have a trusted 
> certificate and reported
> as having a bad password entered instead.
> 
> Supreeya Miller
> Visualization Researcher, System Administrator, and Access 
> Grid Coordinator
> Center of Higher Learning
> Building 1103
> Stennis Space Center, MS  39529
> 228-688-2190
> Internal Mail Box: 10002
> Supreeya.Miller at usm.edu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov]On
> Behalf Of Randy Groves
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:44 AM
> To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?
> 
> 
> First of all, are people successfully running 2.1.2 on Win2K? 
>  I've had
> some problems recently getting it running on this platform - at this
> juncture, I don't remember the details.  But this issue looks 
> like it's
> going to raise it's head again, so I'll probably have to revisit it.
> 
> But that brings up a larger question, which is significant in our
> situation, where XP is just now starting to be installed in selected
> areas.  Is Win2K a dead platform as far as the AG is concerned?
> 
> -randy
>