[AG-TECH] Critical Python Bug Affecting AGTk 2.2

[Joshua M. Brown]

>>
>>
>> We're working on the Fedora stuff now, it's coming along quickly.
>>
Fedora.

Core 1 or Core 2?

>>
>> > >We are building machines with our internal build tools,
>> > which is moving
>> > >us to Gentoo. Gentoo support for the AGTk is not official,
>> > but you can
>> > >expect it will become official in a very short time.
>>
So gentoo then?


>> > >RedHat 7.3 does not have python 2.2.3+ available, RedHat 9.0
>> > is already
>> > >abandoned.
>> > >
>> > >This serves as official notice that we will not be supporting RedHat
>> > >7.3 or 9.0, effective as soon as we have a working Fedora Project
>> > >distribution available.
>
So not gentoo, but Fedora then?

i'm a little surprised to see lack of replies to any of this thread. 
Setting up a new, multimachine AG 2.x node is my *job*. i would really 
like to have a better idea of which distribution will be supported - 
fully - without tricks and patches and adding this, that and the other 
to seven different config/dat files. Stable is the name of the game - 
the big node cannot and will not be changed willynilly.

i've heard rumblings of AG 2.3. Am i wasting my time with AG 2.2 then? i 
spent *a lot* of time beating my head against the wall with RH7.3 and 
the AGtk 2.2. The client would hang on venue room changes. Then it 
mysteriously (and by mysteriously i mean no changes made on my end) 
started working again. Then stopped and this notice came out.

i guess i'm tired of feeling in "limbo" here. Is it Fedora Core1, Fedora 
Core 2, or Gentoo? i have people that put up a good deal of money and 
purchased some very expensive equipment and it is stuck on AG1.x at this 
time because i have no idea what OS will be supported.

i really do need a solid answer on:

1) which distro?
2) AG 2.3 - wait for that or move ahead with AG2.2

Thank you.

jmb