[AG-TECH] Fwd: BOUNCE ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov: Non-member submission from [Douglas Baggett <dbaggett at nsf.gov>]

[Robert Olson]

>Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:34:19 -0500
>From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>To: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>Subject: BOUNCE ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov:    Non-member submission from 
>[Douglas Baggett <dbaggett at nsf.gov>]
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 
>tests=NO_REAL_NAME,X_NOT_PRESENT,FROM_AND_TO_SAME version=2.21
>X-Spam-Level: **
>
>Received: from lapp1.cise-nsf.gov (lapp1.cise-nsf.gov [192.12.209.21])
>         by mcs.anl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA119072
>         for <ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:34:16 -0500
>Received: from db-cise-worksta.nsf.gov (db-cise-worksta.cise-nsf.gov 
>[192.12.209.224])
>         by lapp1.cise-nsf.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9FCYIQ11513;
>         Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:34:18 -0400
>Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021015083007.028d55b8 at cisebdc.cise-nsf.gov>
>X-Sender: dbaggett at cisebdc.cise-nsf.gov
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
>Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:34:16 -0400
>To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>From: Douglas Baggett <dbaggett at nsf.gov>
>Subject: VIC - OpenMASH or UCL and OpenMOSIX
>Cc: dgatchel at cise-nsf.gov, rhilderb at nsf.gov
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 
>version=2.21
>X-Spam-Level: *
>
>Has anybody tried to run VIC and RAT stand-alone on a LINUX system part of
>an OpenMOSIX cluster? I don't know enough of how OpenMASH/UCL VIC and RAT
>are coded to know if one would see any performance gain from being part of
>a cluster ( I also am pretty much a newbie when it comes to working with
>clustering).
>
>I was thinking it might be neat to try it out.
>
>Does anybody have any comments on if it could be worth it (other than the
>pure cool factor involved...)
>
>-Doug Bagett
>CISE/NSF/OAD