[AG-TECH] Lurkers in the venues

Jeffrey Eschbach Jeffrey_Eschbach-CJE018 at email.mot.com
Mon Jan 28 20:35:59 CST 2002


Bob,

It's probably not worth worrying about for most of the conversations
taking place, but I just want to make certain that everyone is clear on
this... even if there are no apparent "lurkers" in a Virtual Venue,
there is no guarantee that someone else is not listening.  Although it
may not be likely, someone could join the multicast groups associated
with a VV and eavesdrop, right?  Just because the Vic and RAT interfaces
don't show someone else in the "room" doesn't mean it is secure.

Jeff


Robert Olson wrote:
> 
> We can turn on security on more (all?) of the rooms, and come up with
> a way for the scheduling folks to set up the APIs.
> 
> And hey, if doing this would get you to write an AGDP on it all the
> better :-).
> 
> Are you submitting an AGDP document on beer selection?
> 
> --bob
> 
> At 12:59 PM 1/28/2002 -0700, Don Morton wrote:
> 
> > Well, as I think about it, this idea of passing keys around before
> > a secure meeting seems a WHOLE lot simpler than trying to come
> > up with some patchwork integrative approach :)
> >
> > I see on the Reservations page that secure rooms are available by
> > special request, and there's some mention of needing to provide
> > venues logins, which makes sense.  I wonder if it might be more
> > efficient to streamline the reservation of the existing secure
> > rooms, with some documentation.  Right now, I'm not clear on exactly
> > how we'd make reservations and then, how we'd access the secure
> > room (though I suspect it's intuitive).  And, hell, I'd be willing
> > to do
> > an AGDP document on it :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > DOn
> >
> > Rick Stevens wrote:
> > >
> > > Don,
> > >
> > > We have been thinking about how to implement a generallized access
> > > control mecahnism.  Maybe Bob can talk about current thinking in
> > > that direction.. in the mean time the secure room avoids this by
> > using
> > > the key distribution as an ad hoc access control.  We can build as
> > many
> > > secure rooms as we need until we have the automatic access control
> > in
> > > place.
> > >
> > > --Rick
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Don Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > As some of you have probably noticed, it's getting harder and
> > harder
> > > > to have a semi-confidential meeting in one of the venues (e.g.
> > proposal
> > > > related stuff) without having one or two sites sitting in there
> > with
> > > > 4 videos, audio turned on, sometimes even testing audio in the
> > middle
> > > > of a meeting.  Although appeals to the community at large
> > probably help
> > > > to reduce this, it ain't working, and my uneducated guess
> > suggests it
> > > > will get worse - it seems like more and more, folks are jumping
> > in
> > > > who seem unaware of things like this mailing list, the general
> > > > AG community, etc.
> > > >
> > > > So, is there any sort of thought/interest in some mechanism that
> > allows
> > > > someone who's actually reserved a venue to control access to
> > that venue
> > > > during the time reserved?  For example, consider the following:
> > > >
> > > > - Joe/Jane Sixpack makes a venues reservation on behalf of
> > whatever group
> > > >   wants to come together and meet
> > > >
> > > > - Joe/Jane Sixpack (you can tell we're still thinking about this
> > Beer
> > > >   Symposium :) :)) is automagically emailed some random access
> > code that's
> > > >   good during the event
> > > >
> > > > - This access code allows Joe/Jane Sixpack access to some GUI
> > that essentially
> > > >   allows for blocking out the "riff raff" :) :) :)
> > > >
> > > > Obviously, it's "do-able" but I don't understand the venues
> > system well enough
> > > > to
> > > > understand the feasibility of integration into existing
> > components - probably a
> > > > real bear.....
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!!
> > > >
> > > > Don
> > > > --
> > > > Don Morton                   http://MRoCCS.cs.umt.edu/~morton/
> > > > Department of Computer Science       The University of Montana
> > > > Missoula, MT 59812 | Voice (406) 243-4975 | Fax (406) 243-5139
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Don Morton                   http://MRoCCS.cs.umt.edu/~morton/
> > Department of Computer Science       The University of Montana
> > Missoula, MT 59812 | Voice (406) 243-4975 | Fax (406) 243-5139

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Eschbach                              eschbach at motorola.com
Networks and Infrastructure Research
Senior Staff Engineer, Motorola Labs Internet2 Initiative
http://internet2.motlabs.com              Fax:    (847) 576-3240
Desk: (847) 538-5846                      Mobile: (847) 980-2240



More information about the ag-tech mailing list