[AG-TECH] Combining two Systems
Tom Coffin
tcoffin at ncsa.uiuc.edu
Mon Oct 15 15:27:33 CDT 2001
We've been pushing rgb screens into the polycom
like Micheal mentions below for a while now. It
takes a bit of monitoring but very useful.
At 12:21 PM 10/15/2001 -0500, Michael Gay wrote:
>Date sent: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:19:37 -0500
>To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>From: Mustafa Varank <varank at csit.fsu.edu>
>Subject: [AG-TECH] Combining two Systems
>
>> Hello,
>> Did anybody tried to combine polycom systems with Access
>Grid. Would
>> you have any suggestions for this?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> mustafa
>
>We have not tried this at Purdue as we don not have a node yet.
>As we design our node, I have put some thought in this very thing.
>We might be required to use a room already polycom equipped, so
>I have been trying to think of how to best integrate the two
>technologies thereby creating an H.323 to Access Grid Gateway.
>
>Scenario 1--The cheapest
>Scenario 1 would interface a Polycom to an existing node by scan
>converting two of the VGA outputs from the display machine, and
>inserting them into the S-Video input of a polycom Viewstation or
>FX. Unfortunately, this means the remote polycom end user only
>sees one screen at a time. The AG operator would need to make
>sure all pertinent information is on the screen currently feeding the
>Polycom. Unfortunately, this might disrupt the monitoring in the
>local AG room. However, if two of the same video feeds could be
>displayed simultaneously on different vga outputs, a separate vga
>output of the display machine could be used as an input to the
>Polycom, therby not disrupting the screens siaplayed in the room.
>
>Scenario 2 -- More Expensive
>Scenario 2 sets up a separate node without a room. Of course it
>would need an operator so it might be set up where there is already
>a room. I call this model the Access Grid to H.323 Gateway Node.
> This node would be set up with one or two vga outputs which are
>scan converted and converted to S-Video and then input to a
>polycom such as a VS 4000. This system requires no cameras
>and does not require use of the AG room except for the control
>area. The operator would need video monitoring of the remote
>polycom video and the AG video. There may be no need for the
>Gentner equipment as the polycom has built in echo cancellation.
>For future development, a web interface could be implimented to
>give the Polycom user remote control over some of the Node
>fucntions such as sites to connect to and placement of video
>images. This would potentially make the Gateway node semi-
>autonomous thereby not requiring a local operator.
>
>WARNING: None of these scenarios have been tested...They are
>merely wild visions floating inside my head at this point. There is
>no warranty expressed or implied. I may have more ideas when we
>get a node up and running.
>
>
>Michael Gay
>Purdue University
>Manager, Engineering Services
>Divison of Instructional Services
>1092 Stewart Center
>W. Lafayette, IN 47907
>765 494 5100
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Tom Coffin .......................... tcoffin at ncsa.uiuc.edu
More information about the ag-tech
mailing list