slides

Rick Stevens stevens at mcs.anl.gov
Fri May 21 13:13:40 CDT 2004


the NMI stuff would be good to include since we are pressing
NMI for more funding and we have an NMI grant that is supporting
the network services work.  We should try to be as scholarly as
possible in all the talks pointing out our comprehensive knowledge
of the technology, the groups etc. 

On Fri, 21 May 2004, Ivan R. Judson wrote:

> > >This looks great, here's what I think needs to be done:
> > >
> > >1. Prune this down to a set you can give in 20-25 minutes.
> > >    You want the audience to learn something -- given this is high
> > >information
> > >    content, complex material, that might be only 10-15 slides.
> > 
> > I would prefer to leave the slides in; I will likely run thru the 
> > introductory stuff rather quickly.
> 
> It doesn't matter too much to me, but I don't understand the value. 
> 
> If you're going to go through them quickly and provide the content in a
> paper, what's the value of having them in the presentation at all? 
>  
> > >2. Integrate information about graduated security.
> > >    Deb is going to be there and we should take the 
> > opportunity to show that
> > >    we are considering it in our design process.
> > 
> > I don't know what you mean in particular about that; are you 
> > referring to 
> > the Akenti stuff?
> 
> The talks she's given for the past few years have all been about the idea of
> having things as secure as you need them at the time, lowering the barrier
> to entry for casual use, but providing a means to seamlessly 'turn up'
> security to make it safe for stuff. I'd have thought you were already
> familiar with her stuff, she's presented it to us a couple of times at
> least...
> 
> There's still the missing NMI stuff too.
> 
> --Ivan
> 
> 




More information about the ag-dev mailing list