slides

[Ivan R. Judson]

> >This looks great, here's what I think needs to be done:
> >
> >1. Prune this down to a set you can give in 20-25 minutes.
> >    You want the audience to learn something -- given this is high
> >information
> >    content, complex material, that might be only 10-15 slides.
> 
> I would prefer to leave the slides in; I will likely run thru the 
> introductory stuff rather quickly.

It doesn't matter too much to me, but I don't understand the value. 

If you're going to go through them quickly and provide the content in a
paper, what's the value of having them in the presentation at all? 
 
> >2. Integrate information about graduated security.
> >    Deb is going to be there and we should take the 
> opportunity to show that
> >    we are considering it in our design process.
> 
> I don't know what you mean in particular about that; are you 
> referring to 
> the Akenti stuff?

The talks she's given for the past few years have all been about the idea of
having things as secure as you need them at the time, lowering the barrier
to entry for casual use, but providing a means to seamlessly 'turn up'
security to make it safe for stuff. I'd have thought you were already
familiar with her stuff, she's presented it to us a couple of times at
least...

There's still the missing NMI stuff too.

--Ivan