Inquiry on AG 2 - Unicast
Ivan R. Judson
judson at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Mar 17 12:38:18 CST 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Olson [mailto:olson at mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:20 PM
> To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Cc: 'Mary Fritsch'
> Subject: RE: Inquiry on AG 2 - Unicast
>
> At 11:43 AM 3/17/2004, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
> >1) We have a bridging solution in AG-2 so that probably
> addresses their
> >concern about moving, they can still unicast. The sets of venues we
> >bridge in ag1 and ag2 should probably be synchronized (bob can you
> >generate a list and send it in this thread?), I'm guessing
> the lists are pretty close.
>
> I thought we already had these aligned.
I believe this is true; the oddness being the surprise below :-)
> >2) Why in the world are we msb bridging ncsa venues? That seems like
> >something that should have come up for discussion so I had an
> >opportunity to dissent -- I might have been out voted, but
> not having
> >the chance to disagree is an extremely frustrating situation.
>
> We've been doing this for at least a couple years just for
> the PNL folks.
> The issue is that their firewall folks are very restrictive,
> but would open up a conduit to ANL (since ANL is another
> national lab). The NCSA venues are there because they have a
> need to connect to meetings held in those venues.
That makes sense, it's a special case we should probably have documented
somewhere. Do we have other special cases that we are supporting?
--Ivan
More information about the ag-dev
mailing list