Fault handling redirects in SOAPpy

[Thomas D. Uram]

I'm not sure I understand this.  Will we then check for a valid proxy 
before each call?


Robert Olson wrote:

> I just realized that we can similarly add proactive code to pass the 
> identity down *to* the call and not deal with it on an exception. Am 
> poking at that now.
>
> --bob
>
> At 04:07 PM 3/8/2004, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>
>> Oh, that's cool. I like it. I agree with Tom though; that given the 
>> use this
>> should be isolated to security related exceptions (ideally those 
>> resulting
>> from either an invalid proxy).
>>
>> --Ivan
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Robert Olson [mailto:olson at mcs.anl.gov]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:59 PM
>> > To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
>> > Subject: RE: Fault handling redirects in SOAPpy
>> >
>> > At 03:51 PM 3/8/2004, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > >Looks cool; but I'm missing the motivation for it? Is
>> > something broken
>> > >without this?
>> >
>> > If we can use this, we can remove the logic for always
>> > attempting the creation of a proxy certificate when the app
>> > starts. This lets me make the reinitialization of certificate
>> > state when it's modified by the certificate manager cleaner
>> > as well (since it currently reuses the globus-startup code,
>> > which will attempt to create a proxy..)
>> >
>> > It also leads us to more cleanly supporting choosing the
>> > identity to use for a particular connection if we have
>> > multiple identities in place.
>> >
>> > --bob
>> >
>> >
>
>
>