wiki

[Thomas D. Uram]

I'm content with applying the same administrative controls to the ag 
wiki as we have on the fl wiki.  Is that a Ti task?



Robert Olson wrote:
> wouldn't this break existing links into the wiki? Why can't we just put 
> the existing ag wiki back online in that mode?
> 
> At 12:11 AM 8/10/2004, Thomas D. Uram wrote:
> 
>> 'readonly mode with limited access' sounds like the fl wiki, which is 
>> publicly accessible.  I could move the pages there, as long as we're 
>> happy with the crowds of people who would then be driven to the fl wiki.
>>
>> This would get the info back up asap, and we could thereafter consider 
>> alternatives for enabling write access to the ag community, likely on 
>> a separate wiki.
> 
> 
>