wiki

[Robert Olson]

wouldn't this break existing links into the wiki? Why can't we just put the 
existing ag wiki back online in that mode?

At 12:11 AM 8/10/2004, Thomas D. Uram wrote:
>'readonly mode with limited access' sounds like the fl wiki, which is 
>publicly accessible.  I could move the pages there, as long as we're happy 
>with the crowds of people who would then be driven to the fl wiki.
>
>This would get the info back up asap, and we could thereafter consider 
>alternatives for enabling write access to the ag community, likely on a 
>separate wiki.