AG 2.0 memory leak?

Ivan R. Judson judson at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Sep 3 11:34:45 CDT 2003


Ok; I was chasing a non-lead then. We should be able to discover what this
is if/when we have a chance to profile the server.

--Ivan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Disz [mailto:disz at mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:28 AM
> To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; 'Thomas D. Uram'
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: AG 2.0 memory leak?
> 
> 
> Again, I am not running *any* clients, apps or anything else. 
> I just started a server and am watching the memory size on 
> the task manager. I don't know how app objects could get involved.
> 
> Terry
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan R. Judson [mailto:judson at mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:20 AM
> To: 'Terry Disz'; 'Thomas D. Uram'
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: AG 2.0 memory leak?
> 
> 
> Thanks, I'd definitely like to get this into bugzilla though 
> so we don't lose it. I'm guessing you're running into not 
> necessarily a leak, but the side effect of the appObjects not 
> being cleaned up. Are you creating new apps in the venue for 
> each run or something like that?
> 
> The appservice is really an appobject factory (patternwise) 
> and it's only doing the creating, we don't have a mechanism 
> in place as yet to delete (and
> recycle) appobjects.
> 
> --Ivan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Disz [mailto:disz at mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:16 AM
> To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; 'Thomas D. Uram'
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: AG 2.0 memory leak?
> 
> 
>  I'll keep an eye on it today, like I said, there is no 
> activity or behavior against it.  I was just wondering if 
> this was new or what. Later today I'll look around for log files.
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan R. Judson [mailto:judson at mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:04 AM
> To: 'Terry Disz'; 'Thomas D. Uram'
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: AG 2.0 memory leak?
>  
>  
> The SOAP patch was in before the 2.0 release, so you should 
> have a patched copy from cvs.  It'd be really helpful if you 
> filed this with bugzilla and definitely included your logs.  
> Then if you happen to discover behavior that causes this you 
> could annotate the bug; and we'll be able to keep it open in 
> bugzilla until we confirm it's solved. 
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> --Ivan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Terry Disz
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:49 AM
> To: 'Thomas D. Uram'
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: AG 2.0 memory leak?
> Tom,
>  
> How far back was that SOAP patch made? I have a server from 
> just before the last release. Maybe that's all that's wrong here.
>  
> The process does seem to be slowly but steadily growing, I'll 
> keep an eye on it all day.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Terry
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas D. Uram [mailto:turam at mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:40 AM
> To: Terry Disz
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: AG 2.0 memory leak?
>  
> I know the SOAP implementation leaked memory a while back, 
> but that's been patched.  Also, I've seen the process size 
> grow, but it has always retreated.  Are you seeing it steadily grow?
> 
> 
> 
> Terry Disz wrote:
> 
> 
> Um, of course the process manager gives memory in k bytes, 
> not bytes, that's what I meant - growth by 4k, 8k, etc.
>  
> Terry
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of > Terry Disz
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:07 AM
> To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: AG 2.0 memory leak?
>  
> I am running a server locally, no clients attached to it and 
> it is slowly growing. It grows in various increments, I have 
> seen 4 bytes, 8 bytes and 12 so far. I t grows every few 
> minutes or so.
>  
> Has anyone monitored the server for this behavior? Is it 
> normal?  Do we already know about this?
>  
> Terry
> 




More information about the ag-dev mailing list