AG 2.0 memory leak?

Terry Disz disz at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Sep 3 10:48:42 CDT 2003


Tom,
 
How far back was that SOAP patch made? I have a server from just before
the last release. Maybe that's all that's wrong here.
 
The process does seem to be slowly but steadily growing, I'll keep an
eye on it all day.
 
Thanks,
 
Terry
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas D. Uram [mailto:turam at mcs.anl.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:40 AM
To: Terry Disz
Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: AG 2.0 memory leak?
 
I know the SOAP implementation leaked memory a while back, but that's
been patched.  Also, I've seen the process size grow, but it has always
retreated.  Are you seeing it steadily grow?



Terry Disz wrote:


Um, of course the process manager gives memory in k bytes, not bytes,
that's what I meant - growth by 4k, 8k, etc.
 
Terry
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On
Behalf Of Terry Disz
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:07 AM
To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: AG 2.0 memory leak?
 
I am running a server locally, no clients attached to it and it is
slowly growing. It grows in various increments, I have seen 4 bytes, 8
bytes and 12 so far. I t grows every few minutes or so.
 
Has anyone monitored the server for this behavior? Is it normal?  Do we
already know about this?
 
Terry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20030903/6ec6cc8d/attachment.htm>


More information about the ag-dev mailing list