Document Process Update

Robert Olson olson at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Oct 31 08:16:26 CST 2003


No further progress, been working on SC stuff.

At 08:03 AM 10/31/2003, Ivan R. Judson wrote:

>Hey,
>
>What's the progress on this design document? I think it and tom's node
>management updates are the only outstanding designs we have to finish before
>we can start moving ahead on planning the next development cycle.
>
>--Ivan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Olson [mailto:olson at mcs.anl.gov]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:02 AM
> > To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; judson at mcs.anl.gov; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: RE: Document Process Update
> >
> >
> > If we're looking for a comprehensive design doc for the cert
> > mgmt stuff
> > that isn't what is there now, it's not going to happen by
> > friday, as I am
> > gone friday and it needs more than a day's coverage; I don't
> > see a reason
> > to hold up releasing because of it. A design document in the
> > style of the
> > others is really a new document that I can start working up
> > next week, in
> > between SC demo prep and other stuff..
> >
> > --bob
> >
> > At 10:45 PM 10/15/2003 -0500, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
> >
> > >I've glanced over all of the documents tonight. Most of them
> > are coming
> > >along quite nicely. The two that look to me to need the most
> > work are
> > >the bridge server design and the certificate management design (I
> > >believe we need a design document for the cert stuff since it's a
> > >complicated enough subsystem that it warrants it). The
> > existing design
> > >outline is a good start at what needs to go into the design docs; I
> > >notice the bridge server doc isn't using the template yet --
> > that needs
> > >to happen as well.
> > >
> > >Again, I'd like to see all of these documents done by Friday
> > morning so
> > >that we can announce 2.1.2 Friday -- and the completion of these
> > >documents. The goal of the current design documents is also
> > to provide
> > >a good basis for our next cycle, as such it should completely and
> > >accurately explain what's happening in the current code base.
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >--Ivan
> > >
> > >PS -- Please do read and comment on documents via ag-dev, we'll all
> > >produce better documents as a result.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On
> > > > Behalf Of Ivan R. Judson
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:03 PM
> > > > To: 'Robert Olson'; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > Subject: RE: Document Process Update
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I forgot to mention that we should all be reading and commenting
> > > > (via email) on each others docs so we can make them high
> > quality as
> > > > fast as possible.
> > > >
> > > > --Ivan
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Robert Olson [mailto:olson at mcs.anl.gov]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:38 PM
> > > > > To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > Subject: Re: Document Process Update
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I'm up to date on manuals, given that:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see what it means for cert mgmt and access control
> > > > > documents to be merged; they address different topics, and
> > > > >
> > > > > Right now, I think it's more important to make headway on apps
> > > > > stuff for SC demos than to convert over the datastore doc from
> > > > > tex/pdf to word; when the
> > > > > programmer's manual activity gains traction I'll get it
> > > > > switched over, and
> > > > > will thus only have to reformat once.
> > > > >
> > > > > --bob
> > > > >
> > > > > At 05:07 PM 10/3/2003 -0500, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Howdy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >We currently have a few types of documents:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Architecture Documents (These should all be word docs,
> > with visio)
> > > > > >Design Documents       (These  should all be word
> > docs, with visio)
> > > > > >                              (Example Outline in
> > > > > DesignOutline.doc and
> > > > > >Template in AGDesign.dot)
> > > > > >How-To Documents             (These should all be word docs)
> > > > > >Implementation Notes   (These can be anything, they aren't
> > > > for public
> > > > > >consumption really,
> > > > > >                                 but remember, not everyone
> > > > > has every
> > > > > >tool...I don't have latex,
> > > > > >                                 I do have pdf :-)
> > > > > >Manuals              (These should all be in word)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >In order to close our last few issues on this cycle, I'd
> > > > > like us to get
> > > > > >our design documents in synch with our current code. In
> > > > > order for that
> > > > > >to happen, I'd like it if the following writing
> > assignments were
> > > > > >completed by the end of next week:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Document                                Author  Action
> > > > > >------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >Virtual Venues Design           Ivan            Incorporate
> > > > > Event Service
> > > > > >doc
> > > > > >Venue Client Design             Susanne Incorporate Personal
> > > > > Node Design
> > > > > >Venue Management Design         Susanne
> > > > > >Data Store Design                       Eric
> > > > > >Bridge Server Design            Tom
> > > > > >Node Management Design          Tom             Incorporate
> > > > > Personal Node
> > > > > >Design
> > > > > >Certificate Management          Bob             Merge
> > > > > Certificate Management
> > > > > >and Access Control Notes
> > > > > >Datastore Client                        Bob
> > > > > Converted to word,
> > > > > >to be part of future programmers manual.
> > > > > >Toolkit Core Design             Ivan            Convert
> > > > > Toolkit config and
> > > > > >init doc
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Looking at CVS, we have more documents than this, which is
> > > > good ;-).
> > > > > >But, we do need to consolidate some, the documents
> > that are being
> > > > > >merged can be removed from cvs. If there are remaining
> > > > > implementation
> > > > > >details that would be lost, they should be put in an
> > > > > >implementation notes document.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thanks, we're so close to finishing this cycle I can
> > taste it :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >--Ivan
> > > > >
> > > >
> >




More information about the ag-dev mailing list