License state
Susanne Lefvert
lefvert at mcs.anl.gov
Tue May 13 09:16:32 CDT 2003
I found the attached license file in my copy of wxPythonSrc-2.3.3.1/docs.
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I'm just doing another pass at making sure out copyrights/license state are
> correct in prep for final. This is the list of software we require, that I
> came up with:
>
> License state:
>
> - Python 2.2 -- OSF, GPL Compatible, no copyleft
> - wxWindows -- LGPL (libraries), BSD (documentation), GPL (?)
> - wxGTK -- ?
> - wxPython -- ?
> - Logging -- BSD-style
> - pyIPC - LGPL
> - pyOpenSSL - LGPL
> - Globus - BSD-derived
> - pyGlobus - BSD-derived
> - rat - BSD-style
> - vic - BSD-style
> - OpenMASH - BSD
>
> Questions I think we have to tackle:
>
> What's missing?
>
> What gets packaged up as AGTk and what's packaged as pre-requisite?
>
> My goal would be to be minimize constraining licenses (GPL/LGPL) in favor of
> more open BSD style licenses. However, it would appear some of our choices
> will make that difficult :-).
>
> If we can be sure that anything packaged as part of the actual AGTk is
> AGTkPL compatible (aka BSD compatible) that'd be ideal. Then the possible
> pre-requisite software bundle can have it's own licensing.
>
> I'm assuming at some level two packages per platform 1) prerequisite stuff
> (but specific to AGTk) and 2) AGTk and related stuff. Let me know if that
> makes sense or if you have other opinions.
>
> --Ivan
>
> PS -- if anyone can verify the licensing of wxPython and wxGTK that'd be
> great.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: licence.txt
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20030513/d95f80fa/attachment.txt>
More information about the ag-dev
mailing list