[Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?

[Ivan R. Judson]

In the absense of any respones, I'd like to see these steps starting to
happen. Since Ti/Justin are our nominal Release Engineers, can I count on
them to make this happen?

--Ivan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan R. Judson [mailto:judson at mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; 'Robert Olson'; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> 
> 
> 
> I lost Bob's response about this being the public CVS server, 
> but wanted to respond, so it's in this email :-).
> 
> *if* this is the public cvs server for all FL stuff, it needs 
> to be renamed to fl-cvs or something else. It's very 
> confusing #1, to viewcvs ag-cvs and see voyager, and all the 
> other modules (including the AG-2) module which is not for 
> public distribution.
> 
> It's confusing to use viewcvs on ag-cvs and see all the 
> modules, imagine if you didn't have any FL/MCS context -- a 
> bunch of small choices have contributed to this moderate 
> sized confusion problem. I'd propose we decide a few things:
> 
> #1: Rename the cvs server to fl-cvs.mcs.anl.gov
> #2: Get rid of modules we don't want public (AG-2, are there others?)
> #3: reorganize the 1.0 software, putting everything in the AG 
> module, that'd move VV, dppt, ag-dep, ag-linux-dep, 
> ag-windows-dep, ag-vic (and then decide if ag and ag-src are 
> the same or which one keep)
> 
> That gets us down to:
> 
> AG
> AccessGrid
> Voyager
> Common
> 
> Then add:
> 
> Globus (whichever one/s we use/Release Engineer)
> pyGlobus
> 
> Hopefully these become less necessary in the future, but for 
> now we have customized versions.
> 
> --Ivan
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Ivan R. Judson
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:57 AM
> > To: 'Robert Olson'; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: RE: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I'm guessing we shouldn't have *all* of the modules exposed.
> > It doesn't seem to make sense, I think.  What do you think?
> > 
> > --Ivan
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On 
> > > Behalf Of Robert Olson
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:06 PM
> > > To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > > Subject: Fwd: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > fyi.
> > > 
> > > >X-Authentication-Warning: bach.mcs.anl.gov: tstacey owned
> > > process doing
> > > >-bs
> > > >Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:02:04 -0600 (CST)
> > > >From: Tisha Stacey <tstacey at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > >To: Robert Olson <olson at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > >cc: systems at mcs.anl.gov
> > > >Subject: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> > > >X-Request-Do: resolve
> > > >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 
> > > >tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.21
> > > >X-Spam-Level:
> > > >
> > > >Okay, viewcvs for ag-cvs is up and running; you can see it at 
> > > >http://ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov/viewcvs.cgi (or, for queries,
> > query.cgi).
> > > >It's a very basic install.  If there are any problems with
> > > it or if you
> > > >need any particular customizations, let me know.  Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >- Tisha
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Robert Olson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >|Which, viewcvs? yes, for ag-cvs. I don't care about the 
> other ones 
> > > >|myself.
> > > >|
> > > >|It looks like it's pretty straightfoward to install; at
> > the start I
> > > >|don't think we care about the checkin database stuff (that uses
> > > >|mysql).
> > > >|
> > > >|http://viewcvs.sourceforge.net/
> > > >|
> > > >|thanks,
> > > >|--bob
> > > >|
> > > >|At 11:56 AM 1/13/2003 -0600, Tisha Stacey wrote:
> > > >|>Bob, as far as I know, we don't have viewcvs (or
> > anything similar)
> > > >|>installed.  I do have a couple requests for for the
> > > Mozilla tools LXR
> > > >|>and Bonsai, which are On My List (tm) of things to do. 
>  Is this 
> > > >|>something you wanted for ag-cvs?
> > > >|>
> > > >|>- Tisha
> > > >|>
> > > >|>
> > > >|>On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Bob Olson wrote:
> > > >|>
> > > >|>|Is viewcvs available for web-based CVS tree browsing?
> > > >|>|
> > > >|>|thanks,
> > > >|>|--bob
> > > >|>|
> > > >|>|
> > > >|
> > > >|
> > > 
> > 
>