[Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?

[Ivan R. Judson]

I lost Bob's response about this being the public CVS server, but wanted to
respond, so it's in this email :-).

*if* this is the public cvs server for all FL stuff, it needs to be renamed
to fl-cvs or something else. It's very confusing #1, to viewcvs ag-cvs and
see voyager, and all the other modules (including the AG-2) module which is
not for public distribution.

It's confusing to use viewcvs on ag-cvs and see all the modules, imagine if
you didn't have any FL/MCS context -- a bunch of small choices have
contributed to this moderate sized confusion problem. I'd propose we decide
a few things:

#1: Rename the cvs server to fl-cvs.mcs.anl.gov
#2: Get rid of modules we don't want public (AG-2, are there others?)
#3: reorganize the 1.0 software, putting everything in the AG module, that'd
move VV, dppt, ag-dep, ag-linux-dep, ag-windows-dep, ag-vic (and then decide
if ag and ag-src are the same or which one keep)

That gets us down to:

AG
AccessGrid
Voyager
Common

Then add:

Globus (whichever one/s we use/Release Engineer)
pyGlobus

Hopefully these become less necessary in the future, but for now we have
customized versions.

--Ivan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Ivan R. Judson
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:57 AM
> To: 'Robert Olson'; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> 
> 
> 
> I'm guessing we shouldn't have *all* of the modules exposed. 
> It doesn't seem to make sense, I think.  What do you think?
> 
> --Ivan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Robert Olson
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:06 PM
> > To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: Fwd: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> > 
> > 
> > fyi.
> > 
> > >X-Authentication-Warning: bach.mcs.anl.gov: tstacey owned
> > process doing
> > >-bs
> > >Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:02:04 -0600 (CST)
> > >From: Tisha Stacey <tstacey at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >To: Robert Olson <olson at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >cc: systems at mcs.anl.gov
> > >Subject: Re: [Systems Req #27544] viewcvs?
> > >X-Request-Do: resolve
> > >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0
> > >tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.21
> > >X-Spam-Level:
> > >
> > >Okay, viewcvs for ag-cvs is up and running; you can see it at
> > >http://ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov/viewcvs.cgi (or, for queries, 
> query.cgi). 
> > >It's a very basic install.  If there are any problems with 
> > it or if you
> > >need any particular customizations, let me know.  Thanks!
> > >
> > >- Tisha
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Robert Olson wrote:
> > >
> > >|Which, viewcvs? yes, for ag-cvs. I don't care about the other ones
> > >|myself.
> > >|
> > >|It looks like it's pretty straightfoward to install; at 
> the start I
> > >|don't think we care about the checkin database stuff (that uses 
> > >|mysql).
> > >|
> > >|http://viewcvs.sourceforge.net/
> > >|
> > >|thanks,
> > >|--bob
> > >|
> > >|At 11:56 AM 1/13/2003 -0600, Tisha Stacey wrote:
> > >|>Bob, as far as I know, we don't have viewcvs (or 
> anything similar)
> > >|>installed.  I do have a couple requests for for the 
> > Mozilla tools LXR
> > >|>and Bonsai, which are On My List (tm) of things to do.  Is this
> > >|>something you wanted for ag-cvs?
> > >|>
> > >|>- Tisha
> > >|>
> > >|>
> > >|>On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Bob Olson wrote:
> > >|>
> > >|>|Is viewcvs available for web-based CVS tree browsing?
> > >|>|
> > >|>|thanks,
> > >|>|--bob
> > >|>|
> > >|>|
> > >|
> > >|
> > 
>