[Fwd: Re: Tuesday Meeting Documents]

[Thomas Uram]

Hi Terry:

The document addresses primarily node configuration; since users do the 
configuring, and they have to be authorized to do so, they are involved, 
too.  So, you are correct that the main issue is control of services, 
and I think that is what is treated in the doc.

Let me know when you're free to discuss.

Tom


Terry Disz wrote:

>Tom,
>
>I'm sorry I can't be there today, because I think I need some face to face
>discussion with you about the premise of the documents. I have thought that
>Node Management meant managing the node - primarily the "core" resources
>(audio, video, text), and providing these and other services *to* the
>collocated users and exporting some to other nodes and users. By managing, I
>mean more than just service configuration, which you do mention.
>
>Instead, the document focuses primarily on users and how they login to the
>node. Whether, and/or how users log into a node at all is a presumption
>right now and bears some more discussion.
>
>I look forward to talking to you about these issues.
>
>Terry
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov]On
>>Behalf Of Thomas Uram
>>Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:50 AM
>>To: ag-dev
>>Subject: [Fwd: Re: Tuesday Meeting Documents]
>>
>>
>>
>>Improved Version 2, /with attachments/!
>>
>>
>>
>>-------- Original Message --------
>>Subject: Re: Tuesday Meeting Documents
>>Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 09:42:48 -0500
>>From: Thomas Uram <turam at mcs.anl.gov>
>>To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
>>References: <001101c256e3$adab8820$d815620c at mcs.anl.gov>
>>
>>
>>
>>And here are architecture documents for Node Management and Node
>>Services.  Please let me know if you have any comments.
>>
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hey,
>>>
>>>Here are the two documents that I'm late in sending. The Venues arch doc
>>>is in good shape, the other doc the overall 2.0 arch is a first draft.
>>>It needs some fundamental work -- but it sets some context a bit more
>>>than nothing.  Feel free to comment on it.
>>>
>>>--Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>