[Fwd: Re: Tuesday Meeting Documents]

[Terry Disz]

Tom,

I'm sorry I can't be there today, because I think I need some face to face
discussion with you about the premise of the documents. I have thought that
Node Management meant managing the node - primarily the "core" resources
(audio, video, text), and providing these and other services *to* the
collocated users and exporting some to other nodes and users. By managing, I
mean more than just service configuration, which you do mention.

Instead, the document focuses primarily on users and how they login to the
node. Whether, and/or how users log into a node at all is a presumption
right now and bears some more discussion.

I look forward to talking to you about these issues.

Terry


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov]On
> Behalf Of Thomas Uram
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: ag-dev
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: Tuesday Meeting Documents]
>
>
>
> Improved Version 2, /with attachments/!
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Tuesday Meeting Documents
> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 09:42:48 -0500
> From: Thomas Uram <turam at mcs.anl.gov>
> To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> References: <001101c256e3$adab8820$d815620c at mcs.anl.gov>
>
>
>
> And here are architecture documents for Node Management and Node
> Services.  Please let me know if you have any comments.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>
> >Hey,
> >
> >Here are the two documents that I'm late in sending. The Venues arch doc
> >is in good shape, the other doc the overall 2.0 arch is a first draft.
> >It needs some fundamental work -- but it sets some context a bit more
> >than nothing.  Feel free to comment on it.
> >
> >--Ivan
> >
> >
>
>
>
>